Over the last couple of days, the case against Kyle Rittenhouse has completely fallen apart right before the prosecution.
Ironically, one of the most damning statements came from a prosecution witness, a so-called “victim” of Rittenhouse.
Gaige Grosskreutz openly admitted that Rittenhouse only shot him after he pursued Rittenhouse and drew a weapon on him.
One Strike, Two Strike…
To be very blunt here, this situation never should have happened, let alone this specific case getting to this point.
Had the police controlled these riots, the so-called militia would not have been needed to protect local businesses and property.
In this case, Rittenhouse, who lives full-time in Illinois, was working in Wisconsin as a lifeguard.
During the BLM rioting, he joined other volunteers to help protect businesses from looting.
We have all seen the videos, and I would challenge anyone to show where Rittenhouse was the aggressor.
In fact, when Kenosha Police Department Detective Ben Antaramian was on the stand, he testified that the only time Rittenhouse ever discharged his weapon was when he was in danger.
That is strike one.
Strike two should have resulted in the judge dismissing the case on the spot.
Gaige Grosskreutz, an alleged shooting victim of Rittenhouse’s, gave up the tapes that pretty much sealed the outcome of this case.
Rittenhouse’s attorney, Corey Chirafisi, showed Grosskreutz a still picture of the shooting, which had him with a gun in hand, aimed at Rittenhouse.
Chirafisi then asked, “It wasn’t until you pointed your gun at him, advanced on him, with your gun — now your hand’s down — pointed at him, that — that he fired, correct?”
Grosskreutz replied, “Correct.”
That statement makes it self-defense, period.
Here is the exchange, but note in the bottom half of the tweet how the leftist media framed the key parts of the testimony…
If you want to understand why no one trust the press, today’s headlines about the trial are a perfect example. This witness got caught in multiple lies and his testimony ended up making a clear case for self-defense. This is how the major outlets reported on it: pic.twitter.com/P4qSY33Gmd
— AG (@AGHamilton29) November 8, 2021
This entire case has been a sham and railroading from the outset.
Anyone that watched the videos of the shooting from beginning to end knows he acted in self-defense.
Furthermore, this never would have happened if the local police were doing their job instead of being ordered to sit on the sidelines by local officials.